Submit your work, meet writers and drop the ads. Become a member
Forty acres and a mule is Rueben’s stake,
in sandy-soiled pine-country
by a stream fed lake;
There he plants cotton, corn and ‘taters,
a patch of melons, beans and ‘maters;

Centuries of struggle landed him here
through rough sea-voyages fraught with fear
to endless lost days of pain and tears
brought at the hand of cruel overseers;

Freedom now is the clarion call,
a trumpet resounding
down Congress’ hall;
A chance to prosper in the un-chosen land
and to raise a family by his own sure hand;

With joy and goodness he buries the hate
unloading his burden and buoying his fate
beyond sheltering pines and the wooden gate
of a cozy house he’s built of late;

Children freed from that forbidding plight,
help with chores
and play with delight;
while Mother loosed from unspoken shame,
nourishes them there like warm summer rain;

Plow and plant, then nurture, then reap
skills developed when labor was cheap
are now built-up in freedom grown sweet,
as the tide of change begins its neap;

Wily carpetbaggers with big cash to spend,
use guile and trickery
the rules to bend
twisting men’s minds toward vile obstruction
while ****** the Law of Reconstruction;

Rueben prospers in this miraculous scheme
there in the forest by the fresh water stream
revering each day a freedman’s dream,
then wakes one night to a low, anguished scream;

The scene is horrific outside the front door,
his mind gropes madly
for a safe sandy-shore;
so he shuttles his family to the woods out back
while listening to the sounds of an awful attack;

Horse-mounted specters with torches ablaze
set fire to the barn and trample the maize
then gallop a-whopping as his old dog bays
at a burning cross where the dead mule lays;

They hide in the pines through a dreadful night
allaying kid’s fears
and the old dog’s fright;
Then return to the farm under a red morning sky,
to find the promise a smoldering burnt lie;

Jesus suffered again on that cross, it’s plain,
as sure as if Pilate had taken rein
leading hate-filled men on a satanic campaign
‘neath fear’s hood and white sheets of shame;

Madmen imagine their cause to be just,
leaving innocents moldering,
mangled in the dust;
With swords blood rusted and Bibles in belts,
they shout fiery sermons, as small worlds melt;

A hundred years flash by in slow fury,
history being written with no trial or jury,
It’s the same baleful, sorry old story,
thems doin' the tellin' gets all the glory;

But history sometimes reshuffles the deck,
And deals a new hand
to ruffle the stiff-necks
of modern raiders who race to the fore
to stanch the tide of progress once more;

Blind to their trail of ****** mistakes
and ignoring slimy vipers let loose on the take,
They go scape-goating—thrashing for snakes—
in sandy-soiled pine country, by stream fed lakes.
No one will dispute that endings are stubborn. Books end on the last page as if it were the most natural thing, coffees end in their dregs, conversations end in a silence or a see-you-tomorrow. Endings have that insidious way of presenting themselves as inevitable, wielding their tyranny without shame. A book does not end when you close it, but when you forget it on a park bench or forget it in your memory —which is just another kind of abandonment. There is no word more deceitful than “end,” a three-letter lie with ambitions of universal truth.

Memory, then, is the place where endings have the least authority. Memory does not recognize the jurisdiction of the end, because it is itself the territory of the persistent beginning, the place where everything starts over and over, as if Sisyphus had decided that the fun was not the rock nor the summit, but that in-between no one celebrates —the constant act of pushing it upwards. Memories, always fresh, are never fully complete; they are shreds of days, like those half-used packets of instant coffee in the cupboard —a whole collection of incomplete inaugurations.

Beginnings, on their part, disguise themselves better. No one notices exactly when a dream begins; there comes a moment when you are simply inside the dream, and that moment bears nothing of an inauguration —it feels as if you had always been there. The dream is more oneiric than originating, more a state than an event. Freud might say that the threshold between wakefulness and unconsciousness is a space without clear borders, where repression loosens its moorings and desires migrate stealthily toward consciousness. Happiness, too: it’s rare to witness its beginning —you simply find it already installed, and then you wonder whether it began a second ago or had been there for weeks unnoticed. And let’s not even talk about sadness, that silent infiltrator who knows no proper protocol of entrance. The world is filled with things that do not know how to properly begin, ceremoniously, like the first day of school, full of programs and promises.

Between beginning and end lies an unattended space, a zone I propose to call the “in-between,” a noun possible yet barely emerging in the waters of language like a timid hippopotamus. Better yet: the in-betweenment. We are always in-betweening, living in that ambiguous interregnum, and that is where the ouroboros dwells —the snake that devours its own tail. Perhaps you call it an ending; I call it a beginning. We are both right, and we are both wrong, because the truth is we are in-betweening, and the ouroboros is the ultimate in-betweener.

Memory, too, in-betweens. No memory is not a constant beginning-to-end and end-to-begin. Take the case of the last day of school —the most ceremonial of events. When exactly does school end? When the final bell rings? When the principals utter their protocolary words? Or when, years later, you run into a classmate and barely recognize them —and at that moment something ends which you thought had ended long ago? That is the trouble with in-betweenment: it stretches and contracts in memory like an accordion of ideas. We are condemned to be perpetual in-betweeners, Sisyphuses who do not know whether they are coming or going, ascending or descending the mountain.

What I propose is a radical experiment in in-betweenment: for one week, we shall live as if each instant were simultaneously a beginning and an ending. You will put on a new shirt only to throw it away that same day. You will start a book on the last page and finish it on the first. Every morning you will say “it’s over” upon waking, and “let’s begin” before sleeping. I will do the same, but in reverse: I will say “let’s begin” upon waking and “it’s over” before bed. Later, we will compare notes. The fascinating part will be to see if, at any moment, we manage to capture that pure in-between —that perfect instant where we are neither beginning nor ending, but simply in-betweening.

Because life is not a succession of beginnings and endings —it is a permanent in-between that memory shuffles and reshuffles at its whim. Memory is a professional in-betweener; it takes endings and turns them into beginnings, grabs beginnings and slides them toward endings like pushing a coin across a bar table. If you’ll allow me a mathematical heresy, I’d say that life is a fraction where the numerator is beginnings and the denominator endings, but the result is not a number —it is an infinite in-betweenment.

Returning to the experiment: we shall need to design an “in-betweenometer,” a conceptual device for measuring the intensity of in-betweenment in each situation. It could be a notebook where we jot down those moments of pure in-betweening, those instants when life is neither starting nor ending but simply happening in that glorious interval no one celebrates. “Today I was intensely in-betweening while waiting for the bus,” you might write, or “the four-o’clock coffee was a perfect in-betweenment.”

At the end of the experiment —which, of course, will have no end— we shall know whether it is possible to live aware of the in-between, or whether we are doomed to that perpetual oscillation between the illusion of the beginning and the lie of the ending. I suspect we shall discover we are mere in-betweeners in a universe of in-betweenments —insignificant cousins in the great cosmic family of the in-between.

Because, you know what? Even what I am writing now is pure in-betweenment: it began when it had already started in my mind and it will end when you read it —which is precisely when it begins for you. So jot it down in your in-betweenometer: this text, a perfect example of literary in-betweenment, ends right here —exactly where your memory of having read it begins.

— The End —